Vous pouvez utiliser le résolveur de flux de coût minimal pour résoudre des cas particuliers problème d'attribution.
En fait, le flux de coût minimal peut souvent renvoyer une solution plus rapidement que le MIP ou solution CP-SAT. Cependant, MIP et CP-SAT peuvent résoudre une plus grande catégorie de problèmes que le flux de coût minimal, donc dans la plupart des cas MIP ou CP-SAT sont les meilleurs choix.
Les sections suivantes présentent les programmes Python qui permettent de résoudre les problèmes suivants problèmes d'attribution à l'aide du résolveur de flux de coûts minimal:
- Exemple d'attribution linéaire minimale.
- Problème d'attribution avec des équipes de collaborateurs.
Exemple d'attribution linéaire
Cette section explique comment résoudre l'exemple décrit dans la section Solveur d'attributions linéaires, sous forme de problème de flux de coûts.
Importer les bibliothèques
Le code suivant importe la bibliothèque requise.
Python
from ortools.graph.python import min_cost_flow
C++
#include <cstdint> #include <vector> #include "ortools/graph/min_cost_flow.h"
Java
import com.google.ortools.Loader; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlow; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlowBase;
C#
using System; using Google.OrTools.Graph;
Déclarer le résolveur
Le code suivant crée le résolveur de flux de coûts minimal.
Python
# Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. smcf = min_cost_flow.SimpleMinCostFlow()
C++
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. SimpleMinCostFlow min_cost_flow;
Java
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow();
C#
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow();
Créer les données
Le diagramme de flux correspondant au problème est un graphique bipartite représentant le coût (consultez la présentation des attributions un autre exemple), avec une source et un récepteur ajoutés.
Les données contiennent les quatre tableaux suivants, correspondant aux nœuds de départ : les nœuds finaux, les capacités et les coûts du problème. La longueur de chaque tableau est le nombre d'arcs dans le graphique.
Python
# Define the directed graph for the flow. start_nodes = ( [0, 0, 0, 0] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4] + [5, 6, 7, 8] ) end_nodes = ( [1, 2, 3, 4] + [5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8] + [9, 9, 9, 9] ) capacities = ( [1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1] ) costs = ( [0, 0, 0, 0] + [90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115] + [0, 0, 0, 0] ) source = 0 sink = 9 tasks = 4 supplies = [tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks]
C++
// Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, // and unit costs between each pair. For instance, the arc from node 0 // to node 1 has a capacity of 15. const std::vector<int64_t> start_nodes = {0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; const std::vector<int64_t> end_nodes = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9}; const std::vector<int64_t> capacities = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; const std::vector<int64_t> unit_costs = {0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0}; const int64_t source = 0; const int64_t sink = 9; const int64_t tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. const std::vector<int64_t> supplies = {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks};
Java
// Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = new int[] {0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; int[] endNodes = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9}; int[] capacities = new int[] {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; int[] unitCosts = new int[] { 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0}; int source = 0; int sink = 9; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = new int[] {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks};
C#
// Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }; int[] endNodes = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9 }; int[] capacities = { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }; int[] unitCosts = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; int source = 0; int sink = 9; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = { tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks };
Pour clarifier la configuration des données, chaque tableau est divisé en trois sous-tableaux:
- Le premier tableau correspond aux arcs partant de la source.
- Le deuxième tableau correspond aux arcs entre les nœuds de calcul et les tâches.
Pour
costs
, il s'agit uniquement matrice des coûts (utilisée par le résolveur d'affectation linéaire), aplatie dans un vecteur. - Le troisième tableau correspond aux arcs menant dans le récepteur.
Les données incluent également le vecteur supplies
, qui donne l'offre à chaque
d'un nœud.
Comment un problème de flux de coût minimal représente un problème d'attribution
Comment le problème de flux de coût minimal ci-dessus représente-t-il un problème d'attribution ? Tout d'abord, puisque la capacité de chaque arc est de 1, l'ajout de 4 à la source force chacun des quatre arcs menant aux nœuds de calcul à un flux de 1.
Ensuite, la condition de flux d'entrée/de sortie oblige le flux à sortir de chaque nœud de calcul sur 1. Si possible, le résolveur dirigerait ce flux vers le coût minimal avant chaque nœud de calcul. Cependant, le résolveur ne peut pas diriger les flux deux nœuds de calcul différents en une seule tâche. Si c'est le cas, il y aurait une combinaison un flux de 2 pour cette tâche, qui ne pouvait pas être envoyé sur l'arc unique avec de la tâche vers le récepteur. Cela signifie que le résolveur ne peut attribuer une tâche qu'à un seul nœud de calcul, requise par le problème d'attribution.
Enfin, la condition flow-in-equal-flow-out oblige chaque tâche à avoir un 1, chaque tâche étant exécutée par un nœud de calcul.
Créer le graphique et les contraintes
Le code suivant crée le graphique et les contraintes.
Python
# Add each arc. for i in range(len(start_nodes)): smcf.add_arc_with_capacity_and_unit_cost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], costs[i] ) # Add node supplies. for i in range(len(supplies)): smcf.set_node_supply(i, supplies[i])
C++
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < start_nodes.size(); ++i) { int arc = min_cost_flow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], unit_costs[i]); if (arc != i) LOG(FATAL) << "Internal error"; } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.size(); ++i) { min_cost_flow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
Java
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.addArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) { throw new Exception("Internal error"); } } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.length; ++i) { minCostFlow.setNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
C#
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.Length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost(startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) throw new Exception("Internal error"); } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.Length; ++i) { minCostFlow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
Appeler le résolveur
Le code suivant appelle le résolveur et affiche la solution.
Python
# Find the minimum cost flow between node 0 and node 10. status = smcf.solve()
C++
// Find the min cost flow. int status = min_cost_flow.Solve();
Java
// Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlowBase.Status status = minCostFlow.solve();
C#
// Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlow.Status status = minCostFlow.Solve();
La solution se compose d'arcs entre les nœuds de calcul et les tâches auxquels flux 1 par le résolveur. (Les arcs connectés à la source ou au récepteur ne font pas partie la solution.)
Le programme vérifie chaque arc pour voir s'il comporte le flux 1. Si c'est le cas, il imprime le résultat
Tail
(nœud de début) et Head
(nœud de fin) de l'arc, qui correspondent à une
un collaborateur et une tâche dans l'attribution.
Sortie du programme
Python
if status == smcf.OPTIMAL: print("Total cost = ", smcf.optimal_cost()) print() for arc in range(smcf.num_arcs()): # Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if smcf.tail(arc) != source and smcf.head(arc) != sink: # Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes # give an assignment of worker to task. if smcf.flow(arc) > 0: print( "Worker %d assigned to task %d. Cost = %d" % (smcf.tail(arc), smcf.head(arc), smcf.unit_cost(arc)) ) else: print("There was an issue with the min cost flow input.") print(f"Status: {status}")
C++
if (status == MinCostFlow::OPTIMAL) { LOG(INFO) << "Total cost: " << min_cost_flow.OptimalCost(); LOG(INFO) << ""; for (std::size_t i = 0; i < min_cost_flow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != source && min_cost_flow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end // nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if (min_cost_flow.Flow(i) > 0) { LOG(INFO) << "Worker " << min_cost_flow.Tail(i) << " assigned to task " << min_cost_flow.Head(i) << " Cost: " << min_cost_flow.UnitCost(i); } } } } else { LOG(INFO) << "Solving the min cost flow problem failed."; LOG(INFO) << "Solver status: " << status; }
Java
if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { System.out.println("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.getOptimalCost()); System.out.println(); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.getNumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.getTail(i) != source && minCostFlow.getHead(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.getFlow(i) > 0) { System.out.println("Worker " + minCostFlow.getTail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.getHead(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.getUnitCost(i)); } } } } else { System.out.println("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); System.out.println("Solver status: " + status); }
C#
if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { Console.WriteLine("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.OptimalCost()); Console.WriteLine(""); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.Tail(i) != source && minCostFlow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.Flow(i) > 0) { Console.WriteLine("Worker " + minCostFlow.Tail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.Head(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.UnitCost(i)); } } } } else { Console.WriteLine("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); Console.WriteLine("Solver status: " + status); }
Voici la sortie du programme.
Total cost = 265 Worker 1 assigned to task 8. Cost = 70 Worker 2 assigned to task 7. Cost = 55 Worker 3 assigned to task 6. Cost = 95 Worker 4 assigned to task 5. Cost = 45 Time = 0.000245 seconds
Le résultat est le même que celui de la méthode solution d'attribution linéaire (à l'exception des différentes la numérotation des nœuds de calcul et les coûts). La solution d'attribution linéaire est légèrement plus rapide que le flux de coût minimal : 0,000147 secondes contre 0,000458 secondes.
L'ensemble du programme
L'intégralité du programme est présentée ci-dessous.
Python
"""Linear assignment example.""" from ortools.graph.python import min_cost_flow def main(): """Solving an Assignment Problem with MinCostFlow.""" # Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. smcf = min_cost_flow.SimpleMinCostFlow() # Define the directed graph for the flow. start_nodes = ( [0, 0, 0, 0] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4] + [5, 6, 7, 8] ) end_nodes = ( [1, 2, 3, 4] + [5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8] + [9, 9, 9, 9] ) capacities = ( [1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1] ) costs = ( [0, 0, 0, 0] + [90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115] + [0, 0, 0, 0] ) source = 0 sink = 9 tasks = 4 supplies = [tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks] # Add each arc. for i in range(len(start_nodes)): smcf.add_arc_with_capacity_and_unit_cost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], costs[i] ) # Add node supplies. for i in range(len(supplies)): smcf.set_node_supply(i, supplies[i]) # Find the minimum cost flow between node 0 and node 10. status = smcf.solve() if status == smcf.OPTIMAL: print("Total cost = ", smcf.optimal_cost()) print() for arc in range(smcf.num_arcs()): # Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if smcf.tail(arc) != source and smcf.head(arc) != sink: # Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes # give an assignment of worker to task. if smcf.flow(arc) > 0: print( "Worker %d assigned to task %d. Cost = %d" % (smcf.tail(arc), smcf.head(arc), smcf.unit_cost(arc)) ) else: print("There was an issue with the min cost flow input.") print(f"Status: {status}") if __name__ == "__main__": main()
C++
#include <cstdint> #include <vector> #include "ortools/graph/min_cost_flow.h" namespace operations_research { // MinCostFlow simple interface example. void AssignmentMinFlow() { // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. SimpleMinCostFlow min_cost_flow; // Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, // and unit costs between each pair. For instance, the arc from node 0 // to node 1 has a capacity of 15. const std::vector<int64_t> start_nodes = {0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; const std::vector<int64_t> end_nodes = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9}; const std::vector<int64_t> capacities = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; const std::vector<int64_t> unit_costs = {0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0}; const int64_t source = 0; const int64_t sink = 9; const int64_t tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. const std::vector<int64_t> supplies = {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks}; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < start_nodes.size(); ++i) { int arc = min_cost_flow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], unit_costs[i]); if (arc != i) LOG(FATAL) << "Internal error"; } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.size(); ++i) { min_cost_flow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. int status = min_cost_flow.Solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow::OPTIMAL) { LOG(INFO) << "Total cost: " << min_cost_flow.OptimalCost(); LOG(INFO) << ""; for (std::size_t i = 0; i < min_cost_flow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != source && min_cost_flow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end // nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if (min_cost_flow.Flow(i) > 0) { LOG(INFO) << "Worker " << min_cost_flow.Tail(i) << " assigned to task " << min_cost_flow.Head(i) << " Cost: " << min_cost_flow.UnitCost(i); } } } } else { LOG(INFO) << "Solving the min cost flow problem failed."; LOG(INFO) << "Solver status: " << status; } } } // namespace operations_research int main() { operations_research::AssignmentMinFlow(); return EXIT_SUCCESS; }
Java
package com.google.ortools.graph.samples; import com.google.ortools.Loader; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlow; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlowBase; /** Minimal Assignment Min Flow. */ public class AssignmentMinFlow { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Loader.loadNativeLibraries(); // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow(); // Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = new int[] {0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; int[] endNodes = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9}; int[] capacities = new int[] {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; int[] unitCosts = new int[] { 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0}; int source = 0; int sink = 9; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = new int[] {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks}; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.addArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) { throw new Exception("Internal error"); } } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.length; ++i) { minCostFlow.setNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlowBase.Status status = minCostFlow.solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { System.out.println("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.getOptimalCost()); System.out.println(); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.getNumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.getTail(i) != source && minCostFlow.getHead(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.getFlow(i) > 0) { System.out.println("Worker " + minCostFlow.getTail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.getHead(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.getUnitCost(i)); } } } } else { System.out.println("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); System.out.println("Solver status: " + status); } } private AssignmentMinFlow() {} }
C#
using System; using Google.OrTools.Graph; public class AssignmentMinFlow { static void Main() { // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow(); // Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }; int[] endNodes = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9 }; int[] capacities = { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }; int[] unitCosts = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; int source = 0; int sink = 9; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = { tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks }; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.Length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost(startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) throw new Exception("Internal error"); } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.Length; ++i) { minCostFlow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlow.Status status = minCostFlow.Solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { Console.WriteLine("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.OptimalCost()); Console.WriteLine(""); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.Tail(i) != source && minCostFlow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.Flow(i) > 0) { Console.WriteLine("Worker " + minCostFlow.Tail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.Head(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.UnitCost(i)); } } } } else { Console.WriteLine("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); Console.WriteLine("Solver status: " + status); } } }
Affectation avec les équipes de collaborateurs
Cette section présente un problème d'attribution plus général. Dans ce problème, six sont divisés en deux équipes. Le problème est d'attribuer quatre tâches afin que la charge de travail soit équilibrée de façon égale entre les équipes, chaque équipe effectue donc deux des tâches.
Pour obtenir une solution à ce problème, consultez Mission avec les équipes de travailleurs.
Les sections suivantes décrivent un programme qui résout le problème en utilisant le minimum et un résolveur de flux de coûts.
Importer les bibliothèques
Le code suivant importe la bibliothèque requise.
Python
from ortools.graph.python import min_cost_flow
C++
#include <cstdint> #include <vector> #include "ortools/graph/min_cost_flow.h"
Java
import com.google.ortools.Loader; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlow; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlowBase;
C#
using System; using Google.OrTools.Graph;
Déclarer le résolveur
Le code suivant crée le résolveur de flux de coûts minimal.
Python
smcf = min_cost_flow.SimpleMinCostFlow()
C++
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. SimpleMinCostFlow min_cost_flow;
Java
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow();
C#
// Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow();
Créer les données
Le code suivant crée les données pour le programme.
Python
# Define the directed graph for the flow. team_a = [1, 3, 5] team_b = [2, 4, 6] start_nodes = ( # fmt: off [0, 0] + [11, 11, 11] + [12, 12, 12] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6] + [7, 8, 9, 10] # fmt: on ) end_nodes = ( # fmt: off [11, 12] + team_a + team_b + [7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10] + [13, 13, 13, 13] # fmt: on ) capacities = ( # fmt: off [2, 2] + [1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1] # fmt: on ) costs = ( # fmt: off [0, 0] + [0, 0, 0] + [0, 0, 0] + [90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95] + [0, 0, 0, 0] # fmt: on ) source = 0 sink = 13 tasks = 4 # Define an array of supplies at each node. supplies = [tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks]
C++
// Define the directed graph for the flow. const std::vector<int64_t> team_A = {1, 3, 5}; const std::vector<int64_t> team_B = {2, 4, 6}; const std::vector<int64_t> start_nodes = { 0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}; const std::vector<int64_t> end_nodes = { 11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13}; const std::vector<int64_t> capacities = {2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; const std::vector<int64_t> unit_costs = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0}; const int64_t source = 0; const int64_t sink = 13; const int64_t tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. const std::vector<int64_t> supplies = {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks};
Java
// Define the directed graph for the flow. // int[] teamA = new int[] {1, 3, 5}; // int[] teamB = new int[] {2, 4, 6}; int[] startNodes = new int[] {0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}; int[] endNodes = new int[] {11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13}; int[] capacities = new int[] {2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; int[] unitCosts = new int[] {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0}; int source = 0; int sink = 13; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = new int[] {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks};
C#
// Define the directed graph for the flow. int[] teamA = { 1, 3, 5 }; int[] teamB = { 2, 4, 6 }; // Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = { 0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; int[] endNodes = { 11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13 }; int[] capacities = { 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }; int[] unitCosts = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; int source = 0; int sink = 13; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = { tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks };
Les nœuds de calcul correspondent aux nœuds 1 à 6. L'équipe A est composée des nœuds de calcul 1, 3 et 5, et l'équipe B se compose des nœuds de calcul 2, 4 et 6. Les tâches sont numérotées de 7 à 10.
Il y a deux nouveaux nœuds, 11 et 12, entre la source et les nœuds de calcul. Le nœud 11 est connecté aux nœuds de l'équipe A, et le nœud 12 est connecté aux nœuds pour équipe B, avec des arcs de capacité 1. Le graphique ci-dessous ne montre que les nœuds et les arcs allant de la source aux nœuds de calcul.
La clé de l'équilibrage de la charge de travail est que la source 0 est connectée aux nœuds 11 et 12 par arcs de capacité 2. Cela signifie que les nœuds 11 et 12 (et donc les équipes A et B) peuvent avoir un flux maximal de 2. En conséquence, chaque équipe peut effectuer au maximum deux des tâches.
Créer les contraintes
Python
# Add each arc. for i in range(0, len(start_nodes)): smcf.add_arc_with_capacity_and_unit_cost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], costs[i] ) # Add node supplies. for i in range(0, len(supplies)): smcf.set_node_supply(i, supplies[i])
C++
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < start_nodes.size(); ++i) { int arc = min_cost_flow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], unit_costs[i]); if (arc != i) LOG(FATAL) << "Internal error"; } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.size(); ++i) { min_cost_flow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
Java
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.addArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) { throw new Exception("Internal error"); } } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.length; ++i) { minCostFlow.setNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
C#
// Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.Length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost(startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) throw new Exception("Internal error"); } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.Length; ++i) { minCostFlow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); }
Appeler le résolveur
Python
# Find the minimum cost flow between node 0 and node 10. status = smcf.solve()
C++
// Find the min cost flow. int status = min_cost_flow.Solve();
Java
// Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlowBase.Status status = minCostFlow.solve();
C#
// Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlow.Status status = minCostFlow.Solve();
Sortie du programme
Python
if status == smcf.OPTIMAL: print("Total cost = ", smcf.optimal_cost()) print() for arc in range(smcf.num_arcs()): # Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate, or into sink. if ( smcf.tail(arc) != source and smcf.tail(arc) != 11 and smcf.tail(arc) != 12 and smcf.head(arc) != sink ): # Arcs in the solution will have a flow value of 1. # There start and end nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if smcf.flow(arc) > 0: print( "Worker %d assigned to task %d. Cost = %d" % (smcf.tail(arc), smcf.head(arc), smcf.unit_cost(arc)) ) else: print("There was an issue with the min cost flow input.") print(f"Status: {status}")
C++
if (status == MinCostFlow::OPTIMAL) { LOG(INFO) << "Total cost: " << min_cost_flow.OptimalCost(); LOG(INFO) << ""; for (std::size_t i = 0; i < min_cost_flow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate nodes, or into // sink. if (min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != source && min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != 11 && min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != 12 && min_cost_flow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end // nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if (min_cost_flow.Flow(i) > 0) { LOG(INFO) << "Worker " << min_cost_flow.Tail(i) << " assigned to task " << min_cost_flow.Head(i) << " Cost: " << min_cost_flow.UnitCost(i); } } } } else { LOG(INFO) << "Solving the min cost flow problem failed."; LOG(INFO) << "Solver status: " << status; }
Java
if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { System.out.println("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.getOptimalCost()); System.out.println(); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.getNumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate nodes, or into sink. if (minCostFlow.getTail(i) != source && minCostFlow.getTail(i) != 11 && minCostFlow.getTail(i) != 12 && minCostFlow.getHead(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.getFlow(i) > 0) { System.out.println("Worker " + minCostFlow.getTail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.getHead(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.getUnitCost(i)); } } } } else { System.out.println("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); System.out.println("Solver status: " + status); }
C#
if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { Console.WriteLine("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.OptimalCost()); Console.WriteLine(""); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.Tail(i) != source && minCostFlow.Tail(i) != 11 && minCostFlow.Tail(i) != 12 && minCostFlow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.Flow(i) > 0) { Console.WriteLine("Worker " + minCostFlow.Tail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.Head(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.UnitCost(i)); } } } } else { Console.WriteLine("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); Console.WriteLine("Solver status: " + status); }
Vous trouverez ci-dessous la sortie du programme.
Total cost = 250 Worker 1 assigned to task 9. Cost = 75 Worker 2 assigned to task 7. Cost = 35 Worker 5 assigned to task 10. Cost = 75 Worker 6 assigned to task 8. Cost = 65 Time = 0.00031 seconds
Les tâches 9 et 10 sont attribuées à l'équipe A, tandis que les tâches 7 et 8 sont attribuées à l'équipe B.
Notez que la solution du flux de coût minimal est plus rapide pour ce problème que la Solutionneur MIP, qui prend environ 0,006 seconde.
L'ensemble du programme
L'intégralité du programme est présentée ci-dessous.
Python
"""Assignment with teams of workers.""" from ortools.graph.python import min_cost_flow def main(): """Solving an Assignment with teams of worker.""" smcf = min_cost_flow.SimpleMinCostFlow() # Define the directed graph for the flow. team_a = [1, 3, 5] team_b = [2, 4, 6] start_nodes = ( # fmt: off [0, 0] + [11, 11, 11] + [12, 12, 12] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6] + [7, 8, 9, 10] # fmt: on ) end_nodes = ( # fmt: off [11, 12] + team_a + team_b + [7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10] + [13, 13, 13, 13] # fmt: on ) capacities = ( # fmt: off [2, 2] + [1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] + [1, 1, 1, 1] # fmt: on ) costs = ( # fmt: off [0, 0] + [0, 0, 0] + [0, 0, 0] + [90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95] + [0, 0, 0, 0] # fmt: on ) source = 0 sink = 13 tasks = 4 # Define an array of supplies at each node. supplies = [tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks] # Add each arc. for i in range(0, len(start_nodes)): smcf.add_arc_with_capacity_and_unit_cost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], costs[i] ) # Add node supplies. for i in range(0, len(supplies)): smcf.set_node_supply(i, supplies[i]) # Find the minimum cost flow between node 0 and node 10. status = smcf.solve() if status == smcf.OPTIMAL: print("Total cost = ", smcf.optimal_cost()) print() for arc in range(smcf.num_arcs()): # Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate, or into sink. if ( smcf.tail(arc) != source and smcf.tail(arc) != 11 and smcf.tail(arc) != 12 and smcf.head(arc) != sink ): # Arcs in the solution will have a flow value of 1. # There start and end nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if smcf.flow(arc) > 0: print( "Worker %d assigned to task %d. Cost = %d" % (smcf.tail(arc), smcf.head(arc), smcf.unit_cost(arc)) ) else: print("There was an issue with the min cost flow input.") print(f"Status: {status}") if __name__ == "__main__": main()
C++
#include <cstdint> #include <vector> #include "ortools/graph/min_cost_flow.h" namespace operations_research { // MinCostFlow simple interface example. void BalanceMinFlow() { // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. SimpleMinCostFlow min_cost_flow; // Define the directed graph for the flow. const std::vector<int64_t> team_A = {1, 3, 5}; const std::vector<int64_t> team_B = {2, 4, 6}; const std::vector<int64_t> start_nodes = { 0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}; const std::vector<int64_t> end_nodes = { 11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13}; const std::vector<int64_t> capacities = {2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; const std::vector<int64_t> unit_costs = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0}; const int64_t source = 0; const int64_t sink = 13; const int64_t tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. const std::vector<int64_t> supplies = {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks}; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < start_nodes.size(); ++i) { int arc = min_cost_flow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( start_nodes[i], end_nodes[i], capacities[i], unit_costs[i]); if (arc != i) LOG(FATAL) << "Internal error"; } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.size(); ++i) { min_cost_flow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. int status = min_cost_flow.Solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow::OPTIMAL) { LOG(INFO) << "Total cost: " << min_cost_flow.OptimalCost(); LOG(INFO) << ""; for (std::size_t i = 0; i < min_cost_flow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate nodes, or into // sink. if (min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != source && min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != 11 && min_cost_flow.Tail(i) != 12 && min_cost_flow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end // nodes give an assignment of worker to task. if (min_cost_flow.Flow(i) > 0) { LOG(INFO) << "Worker " << min_cost_flow.Tail(i) << " assigned to task " << min_cost_flow.Head(i) << " Cost: " << min_cost_flow.UnitCost(i); } } } } else { LOG(INFO) << "Solving the min cost flow problem failed."; LOG(INFO) << "Solver status: " << status; } } } // namespace operations_research int main() { operations_research::BalanceMinFlow(); return EXIT_SUCCESS; }
Java
package com.google.ortools.graph.samples; import com.google.ortools.Loader; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlow; import com.google.ortools.graph.MinCostFlowBase; /** Minimal Assignment Min Flow. */ public class BalanceMinFlow { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Loader.loadNativeLibraries(); // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow(); // Define the directed graph for the flow. // int[] teamA = new int[] {1, 3, 5}; // int[] teamB = new int[] {2, 4, 6}; int[] startNodes = new int[] {0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}; int[] endNodes = new int[] {11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13}; int[] capacities = new int[] {2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}; int[] unitCosts = new int[] {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0}; int source = 0; int sink = 13; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = new int[] {tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks}; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.addArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost( startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) { throw new Exception("Internal error"); } } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.length; ++i) { minCostFlow.setNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlowBase.Status status = minCostFlow.solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { System.out.println("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.getOptimalCost()); System.out.println(); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.getNumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or intermediate nodes, or into sink. if (minCostFlow.getTail(i) != source && minCostFlow.getTail(i) != 11 && minCostFlow.getTail(i) != 12 && minCostFlow.getHead(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.getFlow(i) > 0) { System.out.println("Worker " + minCostFlow.getTail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.getHead(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.getUnitCost(i)); } } } } else { System.out.println("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); System.out.println("Solver status: " + status); } } private BalanceMinFlow() {} }
C#
using System; using Google.OrTools.Graph; public class BalanceMinFlow { static void Main() { // Instantiate a SimpleMinCostFlow solver. MinCostFlow minCostFlow = new MinCostFlow(); // Define the directed graph for the flow. int[] teamA = { 1, 3, 5 }; int[] teamB = { 2, 4, 6 }; // Define four parallel arrays: sources, destinations, capacities, and unit costs // between each pair. int[] startNodes = { 0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; int[] endNodes = { 11, 12, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13, 13, 13 }; int[] capacities = { 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }; int[] unitCosts = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 90, 76, 75, 70, 35, 85, 55, 65, 125, 95, 90, 105, 45, 110, 95, 115, 60, 105, 80, 75, 45, 65, 110, 95, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; int source = 0; int sink = 13; int tasks = 4; // Define an array of supplies at each node. int[] supplies = { tasks, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -tasks }; // Add each arc. for (int i = 0; i < startNodes.Length; ++i) { int arc = minCostFlow.AddArcWithCapacityAndUnitCost(startNodes[i], endNodes[i], capacities[i], unitCosts[i]); if (arc != i) throw new Exception("Internal error"); } // Add node supplies. for (int i = 0; i < supplies.Length; ++i) { minCostFlow.SetNodeSupply(i, supplies[i]); } // Find the min cost flow. MinCostFlow.Status status = minCostFlow.Solve(); if (status == MinCostFlow.Status.OPTIMAL) { Console.WriteLine("Total cost: " + minCostFlow.OptimalCost()); Console.WriteLine(""); for (int i = 0; i < minCostFlow.NumArcs(); ++i) { // Can ignore arcs leading out of source or into sink. if (minCostFlow.Tail(i) != source && minCostFlow.Tail(i) != 11 && minCostFlow.Tail(i) != 12 && minCostFlow.Head(i) != sink) { // Arcs in the solution have a flow value of 1. Their start and end nodes // give an assignment of worker to task. if (minCostFlow.Flow(i) > 0) { Console.WriteLine("Worker " + minCostFlow.Tail(i) + " assigned to task " + minCostFlow.Head(i) + " Cost: " + minCostFlow.UnitCost(i)); } } } } else { Console.WriteLine("Solving the min cost flow problem failed."); Console.WriteLine("Solver status: " + status); } } }