鼓励优质网站的又一新举措
使用集合让一切井井有条
根据您的偏好保存内容并对其进行分类。
2012年5月7日星期一
发表者:来自
Matt Cutts
,
搜索质量团队首席工程师
原文:
Another step to reward high-quality sites
Google之前曾表示搜索引擎优化,又称SEO,是
积极且富有建设性的
,持此观点的也
不仅仅是Google
。有效的搜索引擎优化可以使站点更容易被抓取到,使有些单独网页更容易被发现,被访问到。搜索引擎优化包括很多方面,比如简单的关键字分析就是其中之一。关键字的搜索引擎优化可以确保页面上的关键词简单易懂,而不是一般人很少输入的行业术语。
“白帽”搜索引擎优化常常通过提高网站的可用性,来创建丰富的内容,或者加快网站速度,这些对用户和搜索引擎都有益处。良好的搜索引擎优化也意味着良好的营销:想出一些创意来建设一个更具有吸引力的网站,也有利于搜索引擎和社交媒体的发展。一个好网站通常会增加网络上该网站的知名度,而这种知名度将带来更多的链接或网站访问量。
与“白帽”搜索引擎优化相反的是 “黑帽垃圾网站”。为了追求更高的排名或流量,部分网站通过采用一些不利于用户的技术,寻找捷径或者漏洞使网页排名高于本身应有排名。我们每天都会看到各种垃圾网站技术,从
关键词堆砌
到
非自然链接
,试图提高网站排名。
我们在排名方面做出的变化是为了帮助用户寻找用户体验度高,且满足他们信息需求的网站。我们也希望那些为用户提供优秀的网站,而不仅是为了算法的网络管理员能看到付出努力得到相应的回馈。为此,我们已经推出了
熊猫算法更新
,成功地在搜索结果中显示了
优质网站
。今年早些时候,我们推出了
页面布局算法调整
,对“首屏”(above the fold)缺乏足够有效内容的网站降低了排名。
接下来的一段时间,针对垃圾网站,我们将推出一项重要的算法更新。对违反Google现有
质量指南
的网站,该算法更新将降低其网站排名。我们一直致力于减少垃圾网站数量,这是我们努力减少垃圾网站,推广高质量内容的另一项改进。虽然目前我们无法透漏具体信息,以避免有人趁机利用我们的搜索结果,损害用户体验,但是我们建议网站管理员把重点放在
创建优质网站
上,运用“白帽”搜索引擎优化为用户提供良好的体验,而不是采用激进型的垃圾网站策略。
下面是一个垃圾网站的例子,里面采用了关键字堆砌等黑帽方法,这次将受到算法更新的影响:
当然,大多数网站并不会如此明目张胆。下面的例子是包含非自然链接模式的网站,该类网站排名将同样受到算法更新的影响。请注意,如果您试着阅读网站内容,就会发现它给出的链接和文字内容毫无关联,事实上页面上的文本早已被“剥离”的面目全非:
如果缺乏专业知识或深入分析,很难识别出以上站点已经受到垃圾网站技术影响,但一般情况下,这类网站比“白帽”搜索引擎优化做的优化工作要多。我们认为它们依靠垃圾网站策略来操纵搜索引擎排名。
与此同时,这一更新将支持所有语言。对于内容,最初的熊猫算法更新可以在很大程度上影响近12%的搜索查询;该算法在一定程度上,对于一个普通用户来说,大约有3.1%的英文查询受影响。德语、中文和阿拉伯语等语言查询可能会有大约3%的影响,对存在大量垃圾网站的语言可能产生更大影响。比如,5%的波兰语查询将受到影响,影响程度之大连普通用户也能注意到。
我们希望大家采用“白帽”搜索引擎优化法(或者不做任何搜索引擎优化),把重点放在如何创建具有吸引力的网站上。我们将朝着这一目标继续努力,更新并改善我们的排名算法,也将一如既往地倾听用户的反馈。
如未另行说明,那么本页面中的内容已根据知识共享署名 4.0 许可获得了许可,并且代码示例已根据 Apache 2.0 许可获得了许可。有关详情,请参阅 Google 开发者网站政策。Java 是 Oracle 和/或其关联公司的注册商标。
最后更新时间 (UTC):2012-05-01。
[null,null,["最后更新时间 (UTC):2012-05-01。"],[[["\u003cp\u003eGoogle is launching an algorithm change to target webspam and promote high-quality content.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThis change decreases rankings for sites violating Google's quality guidelines by using black hat SEO tactics like keyword stuffing and unnatural link schemes.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThe algorithm change affects about 3.1% of English queries and a higher percentage in languages with more webspam.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eGoogle encourages webmasters to focus on creating high-quality sites with a good user experience and ethical SEO practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThis update aims to reward websites providing valuable content and a positive user experience, rather than those manipulating search rankings.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],["Google is launching an algorithm change to combat webspam, decreasing rankings for sites violating quality guidelines. This update targets manipulative tactics like keyword stuffing and link schemes, aiming to improve user experience and reward high-quality content. The algorithm change affects approximately 3.1% of English queries, with a higher impact on heavily-spammed languages. The goal is to prioritize sites that focus on creating compelling content and employing ethical SEO rather than webspam.\n"],null,["# Another step to reward high-quality sites\n\nTuesday, April 24, 2012\n\n\nGoogle has said before that search engine optimization, or SEO, can be\n[positive and constructive](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS75vhGO-kk)\n---and we're\n[not the only ones](https://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/webmaster/archive/2012/03/23/does-bing-like-seo-you-bet-your-ahrefs-we-do.aspx).\nEffective search engine optimization can make a site more crawlable and make individual pages\nmore accessible and easier to find. Search engine optimization includes things as simple as\nkeyword research to ensure that the right words are on the page, not just industry jargon that\nnormal people will never type.\n\n\nEthical search engine optimization, also known as \"white hat SEO\", often improves the usability\nof a site, helps create great content, or makes sites faster, which is good for both users and\nsearch engines. Good search engine optimization can also mean good marketing: thinking about\ncreative ways to make a site more compelling, which can help with search engines as well as\nsocial media. The net result of making a great site is often greater awareness of that site on\nthe web, which can translate into more people linking to or visiting a site.\n\n\nThe opposite of ethical SEO is something called \"black hat webspam\", or simply webspam (we say\n\"webspam\" to distinguish it from email spam). In the pursuit of higher rankings or traffic, a\nfew sites use techniques that don't benefit users, where the intent is to look for shortcuts\nor loopholes that would rank pages higher than they deserve to be ranked. We see all sorts of\nwebspam techniques every day, from\n[keyword stuffing](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/irrelevant-keywords) to\n[link schemes](/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies#link-spam) that attempt to\npropel sites higher in rankings.\n\n\nThe goal of many of our ranking changes is to help searchers find sites that provide a great\nuser experience and fulfill their information needs. We also want the people making great\nsites for users, not just algorithms, to see their effort rewarded. To that end we've launched\n[Panda changes](https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html)\nthat successfully\n[returned higher-quality sites in search results](https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228436.200-inside-search-engines-war-on-bad-results).\nAnd earlier this year we launched a\n[page layout algorithm](https://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement)\nthat reduces rankings for sites that don't make much content available \"above the fold.\"\n\n\nIn the next few days, we're launching an important algorithm change targeted at webspam. The\nchange will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google's existing\n[quality guidelines](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/overview#quality).\nWe've always targeted webspam in our rankings, and this algorithm represents another\nimprovement in our efforts to reduce webspam and promote high quality content. While we can't\ndivulge specific signals because we don't want to give people a way to game our search results\nand worsen the experience for users, our advice for webmasters is to focus on\n[creating high quality sites](/search/blog/2011/05/more-guidance-on-building-high-quality)\nthat create a good user experience and employ ethical SEO methods instead of engaging in\naggressive webspam tactics.\n\n\nHere's an example of a webspam tactic like keyword stuffing taken from a site that will be\naffected by this change:\n\n\nOf course, most sites affected by this change aren't so blatant. Here's an example of a site\nwith unusual linking patterns that is also affected by this change. Notice that if you try to\nread the text aloud you'll discover that the outgoing links are completely unrelated to the\nactual content, and in fact the page text has been \"spun\" beyond recognition:\n\n\nSites affected by this change might not be easily recognizable as spamming without deep\nanalysis or expertise, but the common thread is that these sites are doing much more than\nethical SEO; we believe they are engaging in webspam tactics to manipulate search engine\nrankings.\n\n\nThe change will go live for all languages at the same time. For context, the initial Panda\nchange affected about 12% of queries to a significant degree; this algorithm affects about\n3.1% of queries in English to a degree that a regular user might notice. The change affects\nroughly 3% of queries in languages such as German, Chinese, and Arabic, but the impact is\nhigher in more heavily-spammed languages. For example, 5% of Polish queries change to a degree\nthat a regular user might notice.\n\n\nWe want people doing ethical search engine optimization (or even no search engine optimization\nat all) so they can focus on creating amazing, compelling web sites. As always, we'll keep\nour ears open for feedback on ways to iterate and improve our ranking algorithms toward that\ngoal.\n\n\nPosted by\n[Matt Cutts](https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/),\nDistinguished Engineer"]]